Archives For April 2012

In the April issue of Harvard Business Review, MIT’s Alex “Sandy” Pentland penned an article entitled, “The New Science of Building Great Teams,” in which he reported on a fascinating study done at MIT’s Human Dynamics Laboratory.  For the study, he and his colleagues equipped team members with electronic badges that recorded key interaction behavior.  After 6 weeks, they analyzed the data, and do you know what they found?

They found that patterns of communication – not what team members talked about, but how team members talked with one another and with people outside of the team – were the most important predictor of a team’s success.   Furthermore, they found that these communication patterns were as significant as ALL of the other factors – such as individual intelligence, personality, skill, and the substance of discussions – combined.

Can you believe it?

Communication is more important than “getting the right people on the bus” or “getting the right things on the agenda”?

Yes, it is. 

On one hand, I say “duh, those of us in communication have known this all along,” but on the other, I’m glad that purely scientific human dynamics research approaches have confirmed what me and many others have been spouting for a long time.

Communication matters.  A lot.

You can check out the article for more, but, in short, they found that on successful teams, team members:

  • talk and listen in roughly equal measure,
  • face one another, energetically engaging one another,
  • connect directly with one another, and not just with the team leader,
  • connect outside of formal team meetings through back-channeling and side conversations, and
  • engage in networks outside of the team and bring key information back.

Of course, none of these findings are that surprising. But, it is surprising that so few us focus on developing excellent communication structures and dynamics for our teams.  Rather, we focus almost exclusively on hiring the right people, building team camaraderie, and setting up a solid leadership/authority structure.  In so doing, we often ignore learning how to communicate well!

The implications here are quite clear, for teams and small groups: we can increase effectiveness by focusing simply on improving communication. 

 Action Steps:

  1. Reflect for a moment.  What do you think?  Why is communication so essential?
  2. Take action.  How could you help create more positive communication among your team or small group?  If I can help you think more about this, please let me know.
  3. If you’re a member of a Church Senior Leadership Team, you can assess your team’s communication structure (as well as many other key factors) through Dr. Warren Bird’s and my limited-time assessment.  Learn more here.

 

email

Top 7 Posts

April 17, 2012 — Leave a comment

In case you missed some of my most popular posts, I’m going to link to them here.  I don’t want you to miss any great content! :)

  1. **NOW AVAILABLE: Leadership Team Assessment** (check out this limited-time opportunity to assess your church’s senior leadership team)
  2. Whose Goals Are Most Important? (re: merging individual and organizational goals)
  3. Trust is Overrated (re: building teams on mission rather than trust and relationships)
  4. How To Identify Great (Team) Leaders (re: finding great leaders in your organization)
  5. What’s a Plumb-line? (re: the importance of team norms)
  6. Quit Trying to Empower People (re: why you can’t empower anyone, and what you can do instead)
  7. Why Teams and Small Groups Fail  (re: the importance of clear goals and mission)

Are your meetings really doing what you think they’re doing?

In her classic text* on meetings, Helen Schwartzman classically defined a meeting as,

“A communicative event involving three or more people who agree to assemble for a purpose ostensibly related to the functioning of an organization or group, for example, to exchange ideas or opinions, to solve a problem, to make a decision or negotiate an agreement, to develop policy and procedures, to formulate recommendations and so forth” (p. 7).

Of course, most of us would agree: “Sure, that’s what we’re doing, ultimately getting stuff done.”

She went on, though, to argue that:

“Meetings, however, may be most important in American society because they generate the appearance that reason and logical processes are guiding discussions and decisions, whereas they facilitate relationship negotiations, struggles, and commentary. It is this process that can make meetings such frustrating occasions because they appear to be doing one thing whereas, in many ways, they are accomplishing something entirely different” (p. 42).

Reflection Moment:

Today, I just want to ask you a couple questions:

  • What are your meetings accomplishing? 
  • Are you really solving problems and making decisions, or does it just appear that you are doing that, when in reality your group members are jockeying for power, building or struggling through relationships, fighting among each other for limited resources, and/or enacting your organization’s culture?

Something tells me that if you thought it was the latter you’d take some time to re-think and re-structure your meetings.

Sign Up for Updates

If this post is helpful to you, please sign up to receive regular updates via email or, follow me on twitter to get more insights to help you Think Deeply, Act Wisely, and Work Better Together in your teams, small groups, and church, ministry, and non-profit organizations.

*Schwartzman, H. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. New York, NY: Plenum Press.